|
| Concurrence | width=25px | | Other |- | width=25px | | Dissent | width=25px | | Concurrence/dissent | white-space: nowrap |Total = | 20 |- | colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 18 | colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 1 | colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 1 |- | white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 2 | colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Stevens, Souter (10) | colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: O'Connor (2)〔O'Connor retired midterm; of the justices that served for the complete term, Thomas only joined four of Kennedy's opinions.〕 |} |} |} | valign=top |Controlled Substances Act; state assisted suicide law | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Scalia and Thomas filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Unanimous |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |USPS immunity from suit | width=20% valign=top |Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy wrote for the Court in ruling that the immunity that protected the U.S. Postal Service from liability for mishandling of mail did not apply to injuries caused when someone tripped over negligently deposited mail. Thomas dissented. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Patent: remedies | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, Souter, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy joined in Thomas' unanimous opinion and filed a separate concurrence. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens, Souter, and Breyer filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Alito; Thomas (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Thomas and Breyer filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Roberts filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Death penalty | width=20% valign=top |Unanimous |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy wrote for the Court in ruling that a death row prisoner's Eighth Amendment challenge to the method of execution was not a ''habeas corpus'' petition, but instead stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Accordingly, his claim could not be barred by his previously filed petition for habeas relief. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Rights of the accused: searches and seizures | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Alito |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy filed one of two dissents from this ''per curiam'' decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Roberts, Stevens |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy filed an opinion concurring in the Court's denial of ''certiorari'', to explain his vote. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Electoral redistricting | width=20% valign=top |Roberts, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito (all only in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, and Breyer all filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (all in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Stevens, Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Establishment Clause | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Kennedy granted the city's motion for a stay pending appeal of an order to remove a monumental Christian cross from city property. |} ==Notes== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「2005 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|